Talk:San Francisco Canyon Company

Apple Inc. Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apple Inc., a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Apple, Mac, iOS and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Apple Inc.Wikipedia:WikiProject Apple Inc.Template:WikiProject Apple Inc.Apple Inc. articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

So what?

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Interesting discussion of Apple and Microsoft, but aside from the introduction the article fails to make much mention of the San Francisco Canyon Company, which is what it appears to be about. Needs reworking. --Steven Fisher 20:55, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Tiny drivers

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I remember a complaint by a Microsoft executive that the large copyright lawsuit was not worth the damages claimed because it was over "tiny drivers" - Google's not finding the quote, though. Tempshill (talk) 04:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

http://www.sonic.net/~undoc/apple_ms.txt explain it well enough I think. - Yuhong (talk) 08:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on San Francisco Canyon Company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://news.com.com/MS%2Bto%2Binvest%2B150%2Bmillion%2Bin%2BApple/2100-1001_3-202143.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930180918/http://www.pcworld.com/article/id%2C5156-page%2C1/article.html to http://www.pcworld.com/article/id%2C5156-page%2C1/article.html
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pa.msu.edu/~hamlin/facts/1stltr.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:41, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic