Talk:San Francisco Transbay development
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an architectural diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Name of article
editThe name "Transbay Supertalls" suggests an official title or designation, but I cannot find any source for this name other than Wikipedia and a few boosters in SF (e.g. on skyscraperpage.com). I also wonder why we need a separate article specifically about tall buildings on or connected to the Transbay project, as opposed to SF generally or SOMA. All of this seems a little unencyclopedic. Is there a more neutral, factual name? Wikidemo 17:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Clarify Please
editCan you please clarify whether the Renzo tower was selected or not selected by the City & County of San Francisco. At the moment there is no clear distinction. Also, are they both part of the SAME project, or two different ones? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dodgersh8r (talk • contribs) 19:43, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
mostly canceled -- needs rewrite
editi was going to add a note that the Renzo Piano plans, at least, have been shelved
J.K. Dineen. Prime San Francisco Transbay project on the block. San Francisco Business Times, Monday, June 2, 2008. URL:http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/stories/2008/06/02/story1.html. Accessed: 2010-11-11. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/5u9xoL0pb)
but the whole article is written in future -- now anachronistic -- tense, and would need to be reformulated systematically. Does anyone feel called-upon, or have better info? Doceddi (talk) 12:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
Name and article split
editNow that the building's ground has been broken, we need another artile, one for the overall development (this one), and a separate article for the Transbay Tower.(mercurywoodrose)76.254.38.78 (talk) 05:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
Parcel map needed
editIt is requested that a map or maps, showing the parcels, be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in California may be able to help! |