Talk:San Giacomo Scossacavalli
San Giacomo Scossacavalli has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: April 12, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from San Giacomo Scossacavalli appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 August 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Greetings and congratulations
editThank you for your efforts on bringing this article up to the standards that it takes for it to appear on the main page of Wikipedia in the "...did you know section". I've been involved in the DYK process, and so I know the time it takes and the coordination required between between editors...well it isn't always easy. So I appreciate your accomplishment. I hope you are encouraged to create even more content! Best Regards,
Bfpage |leave a message 14:16, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot! As Italian (and Roman :-)) it is not always easy to write in a decent English. BTW, copyediting is always most welcome! :-) Cheers, Alex2006 (talk) 14:22, 12 August 2015 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:San Giacomo Scossacavalli/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Will review this. Sainsf <^>Feel at home 06:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
This is a very well-written article; I have only a few comments to make: Sainsf <^>Feel at home 08:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- In Lead:
- The lead is too short; should consist of at least two good paras covering the whole article.
- In Location:
- Can Rome be linked?
- What is riono?
- If a single citation is used you can add it at the end of the last line.
- In Middle Ages:
- In 1275 the church became parish "a" parish.
- In Renaissance:
- Governor of the archconfraternity died "archconfraternity, died"
- Thanks to his legacy two years later the construction could be finished "legacy, two years"
- Link or explain vecchio
- In Baroque and Modern Ages:
- Who is a Cardinal?
- half of 18th century "the"
- What is a fresco?
- The two alleged stones of the sacrifice ... main altar of this church This part needs some restructuring as: The two alleged stones of the sacrifice of Isaac and of the presentation of Jesus to the Temple of Solomon were removed; they were placed in the church of the Santi Michele e Magno (the national church of the Dutch in Rome) in Borgo in the early 1990s. The latter is now used as the main altar of this church
- In Architecture:
- Scossacavalli was longer "Scossacavalli, was longer"
- "niches" is linked twice
- Link or explain mixtilinear frame and candelabra
- faked figures of yellow Saints made of golden metal What are "Faked figures"?
- maintained the original single nave plan at least until 1627 Source for this part?
- In 1726, the closing Comma not needed
That should be all. Good luck! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 08:01, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
@Alessandro57: You there? Sainsf <^>Feel at home 13:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hallo @Sainsf:, done! The only thing which I did not do is linking "vecchio" since it is part of a word: "Borgo vecchio", a street's name (but I am writing right now an article about the road, so in a couple of week it should be linked). Moreover, you should control the lead, and tell me if you are happy with its expansion (and style ;-)). Thanks! Alex2006 (talk) 16:52, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Splendid Alessandro57! I am happy with the changes. For future articles, just remember that the lead should include all the main points of the article. Alright, the article looks good to go now. Cheers! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 16:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- You are welcome, @Sainsf:! I am happy too. Several users told me that was a nice article when it was on DYK.... ;-) Thanks again! Alex2006 (talk) 17:50, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Splendid Alessandro57! I am happy with the changes. For future articles, just remember that the lead should include all the main points of the article. Alright, the article looks good to go now. Cheers! Sainsf <^>Feel at home 16:55, 12 April 2016 (UTC)