Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 18:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

I will start reviewing this soon, probably tomorrow --K. Peake 18:58, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Do you have thoughts RE my comment on the article's talk page, above? Grk1011 (talk) 19:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  • 1 in 3601in360 in the infobox
  • Mention that the participation from 2011 onward was after they did not participate in 2009 and 2010 due to financial difficulties
  • "for the Eurovision Song Contest grand final" → "for the contest's grand final"
  • Target 2012, 2013 and 2014 to their respective Eurovision Song Contest articles
  • "and achieving their best ever result" → "and achieving their best result to date"
  • "was again selected to represent the nation" → "was again set to represent San Marino"
  • "and is San Marino's" → "and is the nation's"
  • Remove target on 2020 for the second mention
  • "set by the EBU." → "set by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU)." with the wikilink
  • "vote in the contest" → "vote in the Eurovision Song Contest"

Contest history

edit
  • "through their national broadcaster SMRTV." → "through Radiotelevisione della Repubblica di San Marino (SMRTV)." with the target, as we already know SMRTV is the broadcaster
  • "to the OGAE Italy Eurovision fanclub" → "to OGAE Italy"
  • The voting rights part is not sourced, unless I missed it
Clarified the wording. Grk1011 (talk) 18:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
I couldn't find this one. Grk1011 (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Must have been something that has since been removed from prose after the responses to my spot checks. --K. Peake 20:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Wikilink Malmö on the img text
  • "giving San Marino their" → "giving them their"
  • "to represent the nation" → "to represent San Marino"

Selection process

edit
  • Remove target on 2018 contest
  • "the SMRTV had selected" → "SMRTV had selected"
  • Remove target on 2020 contest
  • Remove target on year's contest

Voting

edit
  • "{escyr|2009||2009 contest}} through the" → "2009 contest through to the"
  • Remove target on 2015 contest
  • Remove target on 2016 contest
  • The composite score being an alternate option doesn't seem to be directly mentioned, unless I missed something
The Wiwibloggs ref calls it a "composite vote" so I changed the wording to that instead? Grk1011 (talk) 18:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
I meant that despite being mentioned, it does not seem to be sourced as an alternative specifically? --K. Peake 20:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Added an additional ref. Grk1011 (talk) 21:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Remove target on 2017 contest
  • Remove target on 2019 contest

Contestants

edit
  • The languages are not sourced
Added refs for each one, but hopefully eventually I'll be able to find a summary ref.. Grk1011 (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
  • Maybe change the empty rows to pending?
edit

Heads of delegation

edit

Jury members

edit
  • See MOS:TABLECAPTION

Commentators and spokespersons

edit
  • "their respective spokesperson" → "each respective spokesperson"
  • See MOS:TABLECAPTION
edit
  • Neat addition with this section!

See also

edit
  • Good

Notes

edit
  • Good

References

edit
  • Copyvio score looks decent at 29.6%
  • You need to add an archive for ref 8, as that is dead
  • Ref 9 should say 2008 in the title, not 2018
  • Ref 14 should cite an archive of San Marino's URL, not the Poland one
  • Add the language parameter for ref 26
  • WP:OVERLINK of European Broadcasting Union on ref 30 and add (EBU) in brackets for consistency–
  • Cite ESCToday as publisher instead for ref 37
edit
  • Remove this redundant sub-section
This is for the Junior contest. Would there be a more fitting location to bring attention to this or do you believe it is not needed at all? Grk1011 (talk) 18:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
There are no links included here, but you should keep the templates below the reflist when the section has been removed... --K. Peake 20:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Oh! I was looking at the see also section. Fixed. Grk1011 (talk) 21:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Final comments and verdict

edit
Should be all set. A couple comments/explanations above. Grk1011 (talk) 19:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Grk1011 Thank you for the quick response; I have left some replies above! --K. Peake 20:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Those two items have been addressed! Grk1011 (talk) 21:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Grk1011  Pass now, very good to have one of your articles become a GA the same day as the review again! --K. Peake 21:13, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Reply