Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2015/GA1
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 12:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
One of your two Eurovision nominees, so I will help axe this from the queue! --K. Peake 12:02, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
edit- Infobox looks good!
- "represented San Marino in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest." → "represented San Marino in the Junior Eurovision Song Contest on separate occasions."
- "The 2015 entry was" → "The 2015 entry in the Eurovision Song Contest was" to be specific
- "in Moscow, and a contest on social media" → "in Moscow and a contest on social media" with the wikilink
Background
edit- Wikilink Eurovision Song Contest
- "Their debut entry" → "The nation's debut entry"
- "failed to qualify to the final" → "failed to qualify for the [[San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2008#Grand final|grand final" with the target
- Target semi-final to Eurovision Song Contest 2008#Semi-final 1 to lead to the one the country competed in
- "the final." → "the grand final." with the target
- "Between 2012 and 2014," → "From 2012 to 2014,"
- Add a source for Jürgens' years or reword to mentioning them being in the 1960s
- "to the final," → "for the grand final;"
- "to bring San Marino" → "to bring the nation"
- "that the nation would" → "that San Marino would"
Before Eurovision
editInternal selection
edit- Img looks good!
- "at SMRTV's studios." → "at the broadcaster's studios."
- "while Simoncini represented" → "while Simoncini had represented"
- Lowercase the Peppermints per MOS:THEMUSIC
- "when she turned sixteen." → "when she turned 16." per MOS:NUM
- "had composed twenty-three" → "had composed 23" but this sentence is not sourced
- "Seventeen of those entries were written together with Meinunger." → "17 of those entries were written together with Bernd Meinunger."
- "for the contest," → "for the Eurovision Song Contest,"
- "These adaptations included..." this sentence is not sourced
Promotion
edit- "on 16 March." → "on 16 March 2015."
- "organization MEI, and record label" → "organization MEI and record label" with the wikilink
- "The duo also embarked" → "Simoncini and Perniola also embarked"
At Eurovision
edit- Target Eurovision Rules to Rules of the Eurovision Song Contest
- Target Big Five to Big Five (Eurovision) per MOS:LINK2SECT
- "are required to" → "were required to"
- "the top ten countries" → "the top 10 countries" per MOS:NUM
- "with countries with favourable voting histories" where is this part sourced?
- Target second semi-final to Eurovision Song Contest 2015#Semi-final 2
- Remove target on Radio San Marino
- Replace wikilink and introduction on Monetta, as we already know what entries she performed
- "during the final." → "during the grand final."
Semi-final
edit- Img looks good!
- "Anita Simoncini and Michele Perniola took part" → "Simoncini and Perniola took part"
- "20 and 21 May." → "20 and 21 May 2015."
- Wikilink Antonello Carozza
- "in a white dress shirt," → "in a white shirt,"
- "that becomes covered" → "that became covered"
- "failed to qualify to" → "failed to qualify for"
- "among the top ten nations." → "among the top 10 nations." per MOS:NUM
Voting
edit- The second sentence does not appear to be sourced
- "This jury was" are you sure it was only them and not all of the jury?
- "and that the" → "and how the"
- [36] should be solely at the end of the para since it is used for the last two sentences
- "and grand final" → "and the grand final"
- "San Marino scored six" → "the nation scored six"
- "in the second semi-final and grand final of the contest," → "in the contest's second semi-final and grand final, respectively,"
Points awarded to San Marino
edit- Good
Points awarded by San Marino
edit- Good
Detailed jury voting results
edit- There should not be two dashes after Barbara Andreini
- No sources are provided for the tables below
References
edit- Copyvio score looks great at 15.3!
- Top job on the archiving!
- Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 11
Final comments and verdict
edit- On hold until all of the issues are fixed, but I found original research to be the most prominent one here. --K. Peake 21:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
- Should be all set now, but just note that it's not original research if the sources are just unclear! Thanks for reviewing! Grk1011 (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Grk1011 I do understand the difference but thank you for recognising potential confusion, though where is the second sentence of the voting sub-section backed up? --K. Peake 18:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- It is in the source provided for that section, specifically for those 3 claims it reads:
- Since last year, the European Broadcasting Union announces the list of national jury members in advance.
- Members of the jury must pursue a profession in or related to the music industry;
- Members of the jury shall be citizens of the country they represent;
- If you're concerned about the "five", I can move up the source from the next section? Hope this helps. Grk1011 (talk) 18:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Grk1011 Yes that is what I am concerned about, please invoke the source using a refname. --K. Peake 19:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- All set! Grk1011 (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Grk1011 Yes that is what I am concerned about, please invoke the source using a refname. --K. Peake 19:37, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- It is in the source provided for that section, specifically for those 3 claims it reads:
- Grk1011 I do understand the difference but thank you for recognising potential confusion, though where is the second sentence of the voting sub-section backed up? --K. Peake 18:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Should be all set now, but just note that it's not original research if the sources are just unclear! Thanks for reviewing! Grk1011 (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
- Grk1011 ✓ Pass, apologies if this took a while longer than your previous GANs due to the confusion over the ref! --K. Peake 19:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)