Talk:San Marino in the Eurovision Song Contest 2017/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 12:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

I will review this soon; hopefully you will succeed in promoting this GT ultimately! --K. Peake 12:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lead

• Wikilink Ralph Siegel in the infobox
• Swap the order of the other two songwriters per the body
• "and the completion of a tour that included a stops in" → "and promotional performances in" per the body
• "San Marino performed tenth" → "San Marino performed 10th" per MOS:NUM
• Shouldn't the Eurovision Song Contest final sub-section be retitled to grand final like most have been and then you fix the pipe accordingly?

 Done except the last one. There is a bit of a disagreement about how we want to refer to it. I'll update it to whatever term is decided when that happens. Grk1011 (talk) 15:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Grk1011 It is best not to update it until the discussion is resolved, to avoid stability issues. --K. Peake 15:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Background

• You should add a comma after "next two entries" and one after 2016 for correct separation
• "San Marino was included on the European Broadcasting Union's (EBU) list" → "the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) included San Marino on their list"

 Done

Before Eurovision

Internal selection

• Pipe SMRTV to San Marino RTV on the img text
• "On 7 March 2017, SMRTV Director General" → "On 7 March 2017, Radiotelevisione della Repubblica di San Marino (SMRTV) director general" with the pipe
• Unless I missed something in the wording, the studios part is not sourced
• Pipe 2012, 2013 and 2014 to their respective Eurovision articles
• "2012 through 2015." → "2012 through to 2015."
• The first sentence of SMRTV's response does not appear to be properly sourced
• "to represent that nation;" → "to represent the nation;"

 Done

Promotion

• "were filmed by" → "was filmed by"
• "on 24 March" → "on 24 March 2017"
• "where they performed" → "where they performed the song"
• "On 8 April, they performed during the ninth edition" → "On 8 April 2017, the two performed during the ninth annual edition"
• Remove wikilink on Spain

 Done

At Eurovision

• "at International Exhibition Centre" → "at the International Exhibition Centre"
• Remember my earlier comment about the grand final pipe, if it is fully relevant
• Even though the countries not needing to qualify is sourced, that being part of the Eurovision Rules is not
• "The European Broadcasting Union (EBU) split up" → "The EBU split up"
• The favourable voting histories part is not sourced
• Pipe second semi final to Eurovision Song Contest 2017#Semi-final 2
• "on 13 April" → "on 13 April 2017"
• The Radio San Marino broadcast is not sourced

 Done

Semi-final

• Img looks good!
• "in dress rehearsals on" → "in respective dress rehearsals on"
• "on 10 May," → "on 10 May 2017,"
• Monetta's outfit is sourced as black and white, but Wilson's is only sourced as black so reword accordingly
• The chandelier is unsourced
• Last para looks good!

 Done

Voting

• Whole sub-section looks good apart from Fabrizio Raggi appearing not to be sourced as a chairperson, unless that's what Juror A indicates?

 Done

References

• Copyvio score looks quite good at 20.6%
• Make sure all of these are archived by using the tool
• Cite Quotidiano.net as publisher instead for ref 14
• Fix MOS:QWQ issues with refs 15 and 31 plus add SMRTV in brackets for both and wikilink San Marino RTV on the first ref
• Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 25

 Done

Final comments and verdict

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; neat article like your previous ones, though! --K. Peake 17:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

I believe I addressed all the issues you noted. Let me know if I missed anything! Grk1011 (talk) 23:34, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Grk1011 ✓ Pass now, you have implemented everything as far as I can see apart from the grand final point, but you have a valid reason not to! --K. Peake 07:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)