Talk:San Sebastiano, Verona
Latest comment: 4 years ago by The Squirrel Conspiracy in topic Did you know? nomination
 | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's "European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
 | A fact from San Sebastiano, Verona appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know? nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
.jpg)
Façade at San Nicolò all'Arena
- ... that after the former church of San Sebastiano in Verona was bombed in 1945, its façade was relocated to San Nicolò all'Arena (pictured)? Source: "Tra il 1951 ed il 1953 si risolse la questione smontando e traslando a San Nicolò i resti della facciata della ex-chiesa di San Sebastiano dei Gesuiti, distrutta dai bombardamenti bellici." (source)
Created by Xwejnusgozo (talk). Self-nominated at 13:09, 10 May 2020 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- The number of sources is pretty shallow, but they exist for the hook paragraphs, and their heavy reuse means the articles are cited more generally. They're in Italian, so I can't read them, but I'll trust that they're accurate, since this isn't a touchy area. - Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - checked one via earwig's, AGF other is same
Hook eligibility:
- Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
- Interesting: - definitely; nice one!
- Other problems: - I added a wikilink to façade, otherwise looks good
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
This template doesn't seem to allow me to add comments to green checks, but all the red x's are actually green checks. Sorry for the confustion; I'm trying to learn the system here. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 03:27, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Sdkb: Thanks for the review! You're right that the sources are rather limited, and I'm sure there are better ones out there, but these were the only ones which I found readily available on the internet (unfortunately I do not have access to any literature on Verona).
- As a sidenote regarding the use of the DYK checklist template, whenever I use it I usually add just "y" or "n" within the template and add all my comments at the bottom (see for example my review of the Fremantle Fortress nomination) to avoid getting the crosses. Note that the template is not obligatory - if you want you can also just write your comments for the review (you can still use the template as a guideline or checklist in this case).
- All the best! Xwejnusgozo (talk) 12:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think I'll likely do that next time if the template remains the same. Anyways, just to make it clear to anyone quickly scrolling by, I'll restate:
article is ready with AGF in my view. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 17:21, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think I'll likely do that next time if the template remains the same. Anyways, just to make it clear to anyone quickly scrolling by, I'll restate: