This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
They also dropped MeritCare from their name and are back to just Sanford Health. There are a lot of issues that need to be addressed in this article. -- sdgjake (talk) 15:12, 6 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago7 comments5 people in discussion
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved. In the process, I discovered that the article was originally at the requested title, and was cut-and-pasted to the longer one. I therefore merged the histories and reverted the cut-and-paste move, thereby restoring the short title. Under the circumstances, I consider it highly unlikely that the longer, awkward title was ever used by anyone as a "common name" for this entity. R'n'B (call me Russ) 00:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. That's exactly why the policy is that we don't automatically follow every change of official name with a change of article title. If it can be shown that the common name has changed too, that's different, but no evidence has been offered that it has. Relisting to give some chance to provide this evidence, or alternatively to conclude that the common name hasn't changed, and so the artice title shouldn't change either. Andrewa (talk) 12:01, 20 March 2011 (UTC)Reply