Talk:Sankt-Peterburgskie Vedomosti

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

[Untit;ed]

edit

I'm a little confused by the picture - it is clearly the 28 June 1711 edition of the newspaper, but the title seems not to be just Vedomosti. However, the article suggests that the paper was only renamed in 1727 - by which reasoning a 1711 edition should simply be entitled Vedomosti. Is this an 1855 reprint with the new title retroactively applied? Or is the reference to Saint Petersburg in the top line simply the location of printing rather than an integral part of the title? TheGrappler 16:52, 19 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

You are absolutely correct. It is "the location of printing rather than an integral part of the title". Cheers, Ghirla -трёп- 07:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Sankt-Peterburgskie Vedomosti. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:10, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply