Talk:VTA light rail

File:UTDC VTA LightRailCar.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:UTDC VTA LightRailCar.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 10 October 2011 What should I do? Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:31, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Ridership numbers.

The VTA has a really spiffy data portal where you can get detailed ridership numbers. This is neat! However, the portal is slow (apparently nine million rows is a lot), and cranky about permalinks. I think the data only goes back to January of 2014. So, filtering on Line (900, 901, 902 for light rail as opposed to bus service) and using "roll-ups" on date (by day) and "on" (boardings) with "sum" aggregation, plus sorting by "on", the maximum ridership in the dataset is 36,105 on September 30, 2014, which isn't any more than the record from 2008. But since it took me this long to actually use the darned thing, I figured I'd make a note of it here. (Seriously, it is slow.) grendel|khan 23:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Isn't it a bit disingenuous to post the 2021 ridership numbers as proof that people aren't using the system, there was a mass shooting at the railyard in 2021. I think we shouldn't try to post things in this article that make it seem like we are trying to trick the reader. I would suggest 2019 numbers, or we should put the caveat that the system was shut down for months in 2021. 98.210.12.230 (talk) 19:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Is the percentage of occupation relatively low, or are the trains relatively short?--Ulamm (talk) 22:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority light rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.apta.com/resources/statistics/Pages/RidershipArchives.aspx%29
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130820152521/http://vta.org/news/factsheets/bus_lightrail_trolly_information/lightrail_overview.pdf to http://www.vta.org/news/factsheets/bus_lightrail_trolly_information/lightrail_overview.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100711175745/http://www.vta.org/projects/capitol_rail_project/noi_celr_eis_091609.pdf to http://www.vta.org/projects/capitol_rail_project/noi_celr_eis_091609.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:28, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority light rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150321210759/http://www.kinkisharyo-usa.com/media/pdf/stclara.pdf to http://www.kinkisharyo-usa.com/media/pdf/stclara.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:37, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Route changes Dec 28

FYI... changes are coming to VTA bus and light rail routes on Dec 28. Ikluft (talk) 00:30, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

The Rail infrastructure section needs work

Just saying this out loud -- the rail infrastructure section needs work. A lot of these projects seem to border on (to steal another Silicon Valley term) vaporware. Many of these plans date back to the mid-2000s when the VTA seemed to think that every part of the county needed a light rail line, no matter how small the ridership. Which of these projects are actually likely to happen? Should some be removed? Should we add a section talking about VTA's plans that never got off the drawing board? -- RickyCourtney (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• VTA 930 Interior.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:38, 27 June 2020 (UTC)