GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
(1). It is well written
1(a) the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct
Well, I checked the Article and I could not find spelling mistakes very easily. So the article satisfies condition 1(a).
1(b) it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.
Everything is proper.
So the article satisfies condition 1(b).
(2). It is factually accurate and verifiable
2(a). it provides references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance with the guide to layout,
2(b). at minimum, it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons.
2(c). it contains no original research.
(3). It is broad in its coverage
3(a). it addresses the main aspects of the topic
3(b). it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
(4). It is neutral, it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
(5). It is stable, it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. It is illustrated, if possible, by images
6(a). Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content.
6(b). Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
OVERALL ---
I gladly will promote this article. But I found that most of the contents of this article is just copied from Bommarillu. The Plot section is word to word xerox copied. Although Santosh Subramaniam is a remake of Bomarillu, that doesn't mean even the text should be the remake. Some originality is required. Anyway there is no rule on Wikipedia regarding this.
Since the article satisfies GA criteria. I will promote this article. Thankyou, KensplanetTalkE-mailContributions