Talk:Saquinavir

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Saquinavir.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Pharmacology High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

AIDS Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject AIDS, an attempt to build a comprehensive, detailed, and accessible guide to AIDS, HIV, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.AIDSWikipedia:WikiProject AIDSTemplate:WikiProject AIDSAIDS articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine: Translation Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Translation task force (assessed as High-importance).

Work in progress

Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Work in progress. I plan to add more information shortly. Espresso Addict 04:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

The historical remarks are too vague. It is alleged - by whom? Rushed to market by Roche - so what did the FDA have to say to that? It cannot have entered the market without approval. Conditions very bad - what is that supposed to mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.248.138.103 (talk) 12:39, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree that the current wording is poor. Please feel free to edit or delete the offending phrases; I have a potential conflict of interest regarding this article and so am unable to do so. Espresso Addict (talk) 19:05, 26 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Link to "actual photo"

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The link to the "actual photo" under "Further reading" does not work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.6.80.35 (talk) 19:43, 20 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic