Talk:Saracen's Head, London

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 79.71.164.106 in topic So, where's the viaduct ? Snow Hill confusion

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk05:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
Site of the Saracen's Head Inn
  • ... that the Saracen's Head is where Nicholas Nickleby first encountered the one-eyed schoolmaster Wackford Squeers? Source: "Is is here that Wackford Squeers, the dreadful schoolmaster who has but one eye ... is introduced to Nicholas Nickleby" The London Encyclopedia 3rd edition p. 822

Created by Ritchie333 (talk) and Whispyhistory (talk). Nominated by Ritchie333 (talk) at 19:03, 23 September 2020 (UTC).Reply

  •   New enough, long enough, neutrally written, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Image is freely licensed. QPQ done.
  • My only concern is how this hook works vis a vis Rule C6. The novel is mixing fact and fiction, as novels often do, but it seems borderline per DYK rules. I'm wondering if you could mention that the real-life signs and structure of the pub were incorporated into the fictional plot, or something like that? Yoninah (talk) 22:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Well, it is talking about fiction but in a non-fiction reference book, which highlights its relevance. Several other blogs talking about the inn also mention the Dickens connection as a cultural reference. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
Pinging Ritchie333. Yoninah (talk) 19:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

So, where's the viaduct ? Snow Hill confusion

edit

Since the Saracen's Head was demolished to make way for the Holborn Viaduct, how come there's no viaduct pictured?

This article needs a map/graphic to show the relationship between where the signage is and where the viaduct is.

Plus, the viaduct article needs to mention the destruction of Saracen's Head as part of the viaduct's construction. 2600:8800:785:2A00:C23F:D5FF:FEC4:D51D (talk) 04:33, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

It's not an FA; find a reliable source, be bold and add it in. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
The problem is that the inn was not in the viaduct’s footprint, so it did not need to be torn down for its construction. Qwirkle (talk) 15:34, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
See this source or contemporaneous maps. The marker is at the replacement structure, on a slightly different site. Qwirkle (talk) 19:52, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
According to this source, "Saracen's Head, a celebrated tavern .... it was removed in constructing the Holburn Viaduct" Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:45, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

"In the 18th century, the Mohocks kidnapped several elderly women at the inn, trapped them in barrels, and rolled them downhill towards Newgate Street.[4]" apart from the clear evidence of the photograph it is IMPOSSIBLE to roll a barrel downhill towards Newgate Street as it is Snow Hill which leads from Farringdon Street UPHILL towards Newgate Street. This is true now and was true before the Viaduct was built as a glance at any map of the period will show.92.1.14.246 (talk) 06:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

That's what the source says - verbatim "the Saracen's Head (demolished 1868), a popular tavern used by Samuel Pepys and Jonathan Swift, and was where the eighteenth century Mohock gang engaged in their practice of kidnapping elderly woman and placing them in barrels which they rolled down to Newgate Street" - the idea here is that they met women at the pub, assaulted them, stuck them in barrels elsewhere, then rolled those down to Newgate Street. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:28, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
IMS, that was a single alleged incident; any source which suggests it was a “practice” is suspect. Qwirkle (talk) 15:34, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
What other source do you have? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:36, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

I know it is what the alleged 'source' says that is why I cut and pasterd it - the fact is it is IMPOSSIBLE to roll somebody 'down to Newgate Street' from Snow Hill or anywhere nearby. It cannot be done. I think a Note to that effect should be made to query the 'source'.79.71.164.106 (talk) 21:41, 19 October 2020 (UTC)Reply