Talk:Sarah Cahill (model)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sarah Cahill (model) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
"Miss Robbed USA"
editThe "Miss Robbed USA" title might sound like a hoax but it is in fact real... Cahill is generally recognised as one of the most beautiful non-finalists in the pageant's recent history. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 02:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
Acting history
editNot sure why the "bot" decided to undo several edits, one correcting the word "receive," which was spelled incorrectly as "reeive" and the one adding her credit in Iron Man, which was given with a reference. She did the role, the reference is clear, it is not derogatory, and gives an appropriate description of where to find her in the movie since her picture is not on the credit or on Wikipedia. The addendum could have said "stripper pole," but I chose dance pole instead to avoid being derogatory toward her, which I think is fair. Anyone care to comment on the issue? Or should it simply say she was in Iron Man, which seems rather ancillary as opposed to informative. 68.2.25.218 (talk) 07:38, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 13 August 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved with "Miss Minnesota" disambiguator as "pianist" is occupational too. DrStrauss talk 18:30, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
– Sarah Cahill the pianist is the primary topic (by simple Google search) and should be moved to the base name. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support, though I think Sarah Cahill (Miss Minnesota) is the correct disambiguator. Even if there's no agreement for the pianist being primary topic, the pageant winner should still be moved. —Xezbeth (talk) 09:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support per Xezbeth. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 06:30, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
How about:
She was a model, pageant, and actress. gidonb (talk) 13:09, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Support original proposal. The disambiguator (Miss Minnesota) would also work sort of, but (entertainment professional) ( or even (entertainer) ) would not as the pianist and radio show host is also one. In the spirit of wp:BLP I think we shouldn't imply that the pageant winner is still mainly notable as that, so by elimination it's the original proposal. Andrewa (talk) 18:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.