Talk:Sarah Lisanby
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Jytdog in topic NIH quote as "blatant promotional content"?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sarah Lisanby article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from http://asp.cumc.columbia.edu/facdb/psychiatry/search.asp,http://columbiapsychiatry.org/about/annualreport_08/index.html,http://columbiapsychiatry.org/about/annualreport_08/ReseachDivisions.pdf. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material . Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by VRT volunteers, under ticket number 2009073010059227. This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
NIH quote as "blatant promotional content"?
editI recently added a well-cited direct quote of a public-domain website of the National Institutes of Health, which was reverted as "blatant promotional content" by Jytdog. I wasn't aware that NIH was not a WP:MEDRS or even a WP:RS. Toddst1 (talk) 02:44, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- Brought to WP:RSN [1] for broader discussion of "blatant promotional content." Toddst1 (talk) 02:51, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- It is one thing for the NIMH to put out a piece saying how awesome she is, and another for that to be in Wikipedia. The article is OK now, like this.. Jytdog (talk) 03:56, 10 May 2017 (UTC)