Talk:Sarah Vinci/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Hawkeye7 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 18:10, 19 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Comments

The Rambling Man (talk) 20:06, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Few more things

The Rambling Man (talk) 15:45, 23 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Comments above need to be addressed before I'm happy here.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    Too many images, gallery doesn't add anything, the lead image shows what she looks like, the other images provide nothing more.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Address the comments, and all good as far as I can tell. It's a little light but there's not much more you can say about a young athlete like this. I'll place it on hold for a week pending updates. Cheers! The Rambling Man (talk) 20:06, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply