Talk:Sarazanmai/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Tintor2 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 22:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply


Hello. I'll be looking over this review. I believe it can pass it but first, I'll see if there are some minor isses. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Some minor stuff that I briefly noted:

  • The infobox is good but in order to be more descriptive how about mentioning the lead characters presented in the image?
    • There are seven total characters in the poster (11 if you count the Kappa-form characters), which I worry would overcrowd the Infobox if mentioned.
  • Per WP:Lead, the lead should be expanded to cover more areas of the article. The two sections lacking coverage in the lead are production and reception. Just provide a brief intro in regards to these section like "Director wanted" "Critics praised the series for...."
    • Added.
  • The Synopsis is easy to understand but I would suggest clarifying that Amakusa is a city like "the city of Amakusa"
    • Added.
  • By any chance did I miss to read the release of an original soundtrack? They might fit in the section when the music is mentioned.
    • Added info on soundtrack and split the info into its own section.
  • Some sections below the first manga are a bit small. You could combine them into a "related media" in order to make them larger.
    • Added.
  • This article might be highly useful to further explain the series' popularity as some writers said it was their favorite of Spring.
    • Added.
  • By any chance did the first DVDs appear in Oricon polls? They could improve more the reception section by adding more coverage.
    • I wasn't able to find Oricon data for the series from any sources I would deem reliable.

These are all the minor issues I found. You did an amazing work. I'll gladly pass it once you ping me and comment about these point I mentioned. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 23:52, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Tintor2: Responses to your initial comments are above. Morgan695 (talk) 01:51, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Passed the article.Goodwork.Tintor2 (talk) 11:27, 31 October 2019 (UTC)Reply