Talk:Sarcoscypha occidentalis/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ucucha in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ucucha 18:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Lead could be longer, I think
Still on the short side, I think—but enough for GA.
  • Images and graphics are crammed at the top and could be moved a little down, where it's more lonely.
  • I moved the image in the description section down a bit, but can't see an easy way to adjust anything else.
  • Molliardiomyces
  • What are paraphyses?
  • The alt text under "Similar species" shouldn't be there or should be real alt text.
  • Does this add anything or is it too esoteric?
Title: Spore ontogeny in species of Sarcoscypha
Author(s): Li, LT
Source: MYCOLOGIA Volume: 87 Issue: 6 Pages: 749-758 Published: NOV-DEC 1995
  • I thought about it, but decided that since it was difficult for me to follow, it was probably too esoteric for Wikipedia. If I decide to take this article to FAC, I'll try to translate it from jargon to English and add a summary paragraph. Sasata (talk) 20:03, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • According to Web of Knowledge, the Harrington 1990 cite has "North-America" instead of "North America" in its title.
  • This is in Japanese and old, but could add some information:
Title: SARCOSCYPHINEAE OF JAPAN
Author(s): OTANI Y
Source: Nippon Kingakukai Kaiho Volume: 21 Issue: 2 Pages: 149-179 Published: 1980
  • Same for this, except it's not in Japanese
Title: SOME STIPITATE DISCOMYCETES OF IOWA USA
Author(s): JENSEN R D
Source: Iowa State Journal of Research Volume: 52 Issue: 1 Pages: 37-52 Published: 1977
That's also the impression I got from the abstract. Ucucha 20:11, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Overall, only a few small problems. The article is thin but I presume nothing else is known. Ucucha 18:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

And thanks for the speedy response. I am passing this as a GA now; it appears to pass all criteria. Ucucha 20:11, 3 April 2010 (UTC)Reply