Talk:Sauropsida/Archives/ 1
Latest comment: 8 months ago by MicrobiologyMarcus in topic Requested move 26 March 2024
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Sauropsida. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Requested move 26 March 2024
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Move to prior name before undiscussed move (non-admin closure) microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 15:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Sauropsid → Sauropsida – Undiscussed page move. Sauropsida is the actual name of the clade and thus should be preferred as the title, and is over twice as common on scholar as Sauropsid [1] [2] Hemiauchenia (talk) 23:41, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom, appears to be an effect of Wikipedia previously attempting to prioritize common names in the past. PrimalMustelid (talk) 23:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. The Morrison Man (talk) 00:38, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support This page was moved a few days ago by Amakuru after this Uncontroversial technical request at Wikipedia:Requested moves by an IP editor. I think the move should be reversed as Sauropsida is the common name in the WP:COMMONNAME sense, the name most commonly used. It should certainly have been discussed before the move. — Jts1882 | talk 07:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 13:01, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.