Talk:Saving Private Ryan/GA2
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jclemens in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- I tagged a couple of things that were missing cites, but I have no doubt as to their accuracy or that they can be cited in due course.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- Archiving the talk page so severely may have been appropriate, but I had to go through the article history to reassure myself that you weren't trying to hide anything.
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- There's certainly room for screenshots from the movie.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Identified issues aren't sufficient to hold back from GA status. Please address them, of course. Jclemens (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: