Talk:Sayf al-Din Bakharzi

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Iran

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the content was directly copied from an article Saif ed-Din Bokharzi & Bayan-Quli Khan Mausoleums before the revision on 17:04, 19 July 2017‎, in which the contested content was first written in 14:32, 1 February 2007 by user:Jabez.^[1] Material on the website on the other hand, seems to be written in 2017, as the below-left sign suggests. I assume the website copied the material from the article Saif ed-Din Bokharzi & Bayan-Quli Khan Mausoleums at the first place. --JahlilMA (talk) 13:49, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'd like to also add that by the same logic Saif ed-Din Bokharzi & Bayan-Quli Khan Mausoleums would have to be deleted as well, as it contains the duplicating materials with the website. This is ridiculous considering the contested content of the article was first written in 2007. JahlilMA (talk) 13:53, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

^ [1]

Add topic

[1] [1]

[1]