Talk:Scarling

re: wikilinks (why removed?)

I unlinked the names of most of the band members (all but Jessicka and Christian Hejnal) because they were all redlinks — and, honestly, aside from their membership in Scarling., I didn't think the individual musicians were notable enough for their own articles to be anything more than redirects to the band article. If I'm wrong, though, then I'm wrong; I'm not going to unlink them again, in case someone does decide to create the articles. --keepsleeping say what 21:01, 7 November 2005 (UTC)

remove the period in body copy?

Might I suggest removing the period in the band's name in the body copy? Constructions like "Scarling.'s" make the article hard to read. Even on the band's home page they don't consistently bother with the period. This would fit with articles like Yahoo!, which use the formal name in the title and first mention, but then go with the common, un-punctuated name. --William Pietri 18:23, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Hearing no objection, I'm going to be bold. --William Pietri 17:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, looks much better!  Doktor  Wilhelm  08:01, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:ScarlingSLSryden.jpg

Image:ScarlingSLSryden.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:50, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SoLongScarecrow.jpg

Image:SoLongScarecrow.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SweetHeartDealer.jpeg

Image:SweetHeartDealer.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:07, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Genre?

So what is the rationale behind the genre choices? I can see Gothic rock, but the other two... Noise pop and Shoegaze?? Had to look that last one up, but seeing it was a UK movement from the 80's makes me question its addition. I'd probably call Scarling Alternative Rock and Gothic Rock, kick in Noise pop at the end.Knofbath (talk) 03:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Scarling.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120307202820/http://www.imeem.com/groups/Mw7Eca5Y/forums/B3I8QZuc/VQ1VcjWy/guest-djs-sitting-in-for-john-peel-next-week/ to http://www.imeem.com/groups/Mw7Eca5Y/forums/B3I8QZuc/VQ1VcjWy/guest-djs-sitting-in-for-john-peel-next-week/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Scarling.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928161908/http://www.chicagomusicguide.com/interview_scarling.htm to http://www.chicagomusicguide.com/interview_scarling.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/ChainofFlowers/april05.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080907033344/http://www.nofimagazine.com/51musrev.htm to http://www.nofimagazine.com/51musrev.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928161908/http://www.chicagomusicguide.com/interview_scarling.htm to http://www.chicagomusicguide.com/interview_scarling.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 13 November 2016 (UTC)