Talk:Scene generator
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 November 2018. The result of the discussion was speedy keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scene generator article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
| This page was proposed for deletion by Piotrus (talk · contribs) on 22 October 2018 with the comment: The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) requirement. It was contested by Djm-leighpark (talk · contribs) on 2018-10-26 with the comment: As directed search seems to yield a spread of relevant results plus adding to WikiProject Physics may be very relevant Article in need of improvement though. |
Significant Results
edit- this search seems to yield quality results
Confirming no apparent Copyright issue
editWhen adding the cite/reference Raytheon-2011 / I was concerned the wording in the cited article was very close to that currently used on the Wikipedia article. That on the Wikipedia article has been in place since 2007; the reference Raytheon-2011 seems from 2011 and appears a slight improvement on the Wikipedia version. As that dates from 2011 I do not find Wikipedia has breached the copyright of that reference when the content was created on Wikipedia 2007.Djm-leighpark (talk) 16:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Scene generator DAB
editStill have some concerns the disambiguation hatnote sending to Mockup is a little bit of a WP:SURPRISE at that article as it doesn't really describe Mockup/Scene generator; and if I could confidently add a section to the Mockup article with a reasonable refer I would (sometimes an ... ah yes .. that'll work may come to me). Overall I think we are better with the hatnote than without it, but improvement (somewhere) is needed. There also be be a case for renaming the article to Steam Generator(computer model) but I'm not convinced enough to formally propose that.Djm-leighpark (talk) 19:10, 14 November 2018 (UTC)