Talk:Scenic design/Archives/2013
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Scenic design. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Point of View
"Our imagination is highly visual."
Nuff said. The point of view of this article needs work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.137.15.69 (talk) 07:03, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
article needs major clean-up
Much of the article needs to be pruned out or entirely rewritten. To wit: The beauty of a scenic design can produce the most unforgettable memories of life. Scenic art should provide an experience that engages your heart and mind. It takes you to a person, place or thing that can cause us to value it"..."A designer looks at the details searching for evidence through research to produce conceptual ideas that’s best toward supporting the content and values with visual elements...The most consuming part of expanding our horizons toward scenic concepts is much more than witnessing God’s creativity, and creative people." This is simply godawful; high school-level writing. Anyone else want to take a crack at cleaning it up? Bricology (talk) 18:44, 17 March 2013 (UTC)