This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article reads like a promotion piece. I mean, I like phoenicia as much as anyone else, but this does not follow wikipedia guidlines. It is extrememly unencylopedic. Someone please rewrite the obviously problematic parts. Not to mention, this article should probably redirect to the Phoenecia article, or have more info about Schematic Records itself rather than just being all about Phoenecia and Soul Oddity. Brentt 23:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
It reads like someone on acid wrote it with a sixth grade level of English. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.111.5.33 (talk) 19:44, 13 October 2009 (UTC)