Talk:Schichau-class torpedo boat/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 07:07, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Well constructed, will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:07, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

• Section 1;
  • remaining seven boats -> remaining; no need to again mention "seven boats", after all those obviously seven will be the remainder
  • Abbreviate the units from the second mention, some were, some weren't please check
  • Suggest adding the privilege of sorting table.
• Section 2; Everything good, no dab links and issues.

Very well written. Almost flawless. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 09:45, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the review Krishna. All done I think. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 12:01, 17 December 2016 (UTC)