| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Schleicher Condor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This article does a disservice to the Dittmar brothers who designed and built two seat trainers with performance equal to competition gliders of the time. I see several options
- Expand the article to properly include the Dittmar Condors
- Re-name this article Schleicher Condor IV
- re-write this one to reflect the separate status of the Dittmar aircraft and write an article or articles to cover them.
Petebutt (talk) 18:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- If they are different or sufficiently derivative aircraft then they should have their own articles. We can only work with the refs we have. What refs do you have on the Dittmar versions? - Ahunt (talk) 20:17, 16 September 2012 (UTC)