Talk:School District 36 Surrey

(Redirected from Talk:School district 36, British Columbia)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Merge Request

edit

Wikified Surrey School Board article and cleanup then realized this is a dup article, School district 36, British Columbia is the format used for other districts so this should be merged to that. Wakemp 19:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Merge away! Usgnus 13:49, 4 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
According to List of school districts in British Columbia, there are only 4 school districts in that format. Vancouver School Board is another non-conformist. Wouldn't it be possible to include the name as well as the number. Something like British Columbia School District 36, Surrey? I know it's long, but it makes sense to have the name, for clairity, I think. --TheMightyQuill 11:28, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
Let me revise my comment. I think this article should be merged into Surrey School Board instead of the other way around. --Usgnus 16:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

What about BC School District 35 (Surrey)? Just putting school board isn't particularly clear since there are so many surrey's in the world, and it would be nice to have all the BC School Districts in the same format. -- TheMightyQuill 13:39, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good to me, but how about BC school district 36 Surrey (lower case and without the parentheses)? --15:47, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

In British Columbia the standard nomenclature for School Districts is School District No. XXX (NAME) so it would be helpful if the entries followed the same pattern. Wakemp 16:33, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

In WP, we frequently do not use the "official name" as article names. School District No. XXX (NAME) is meaningful in BC, but not outside the province. --Usgnus 16:50, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

How about School district 36, Surrey and then if we need to disambiguate, we can put School district 36, Surrey (British Columbia)? --Usgnus 17:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Let's make this easy. How about we just convert Vancouver and Surrey to the existing standard and redirect as necesssary. We'll need to make "district" lowercase on a few, for consistency. --Usgnus 17:05, 20 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Wait, which existing standard? School District 36, British Columbia? -- TheMightyQuill 10:53, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Sorry. The standard used in List of school districts in British Columbia. --Usgnus 15:12, 21 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

A Kelowna opinion thrown in for good measure: make the article name reflect what people will most likely look up when they turn to the encyclopedia. Are people likely to search for "school district ###", or are they more likely to search for "<name> school board"? Coming from outside the affected/disputed area, I know my first search criteria would probably be "surrey school board", the same way I'd also search for "vancouver school board". Having said that, this may be my Ontario roots showing since back in Ontario the school boards use names like Durham District School Board, Ottawa-Carleton District School Board, Toronto District School Board, etc... --Stephane Charette 21:28, 22 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

In the case of this entry the title would be Surrey School District (the common name) or School District #36 Surrey (the legal name). Either would be acceptable but we will run into a problem when we do this for other districts, like Kelowna, where the name is actually School District #23 Central Okanagan. The name Kelowna School District would not have any relation to the name of the district other than talking about the largest populated centre in the district. So this seems to be something to be discussed on a bigger scale such as Talk:List of school districts in British Columbia Wakemp 01:03, 23 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Merger

edit

Moving this page to School District 36 Surrey and merging the data from the Surrey School Board entry. Wakemp 02:16, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

List of schools

edit

The list of schools looks really long. Maybe dividing them into neighbourhoods might be more useful? i.e. into Cloverdale, Whalley, Newton, etc. -→Buchanan-Hermit/!? 03:14, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

I was planning on putting in an info box similar to Vancouver School Board, if we do that should there still be a list? If the lists are going to continue they should be more useful, I will use School District 5 Southeast Kootenay as an example. Wakemp 15:24, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
Following SD 5's format might work. As for a NavBox, I'm sure leaving the neighbourhoods intact can still work. -→Buchanan-Hermit/!? 17:54, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
My preference would be a footer, like the one for Vancouver, versus the infobox in SD 5. The footer can then be re-used for each individual school, while the infobox cannot. If you do go ahead with the footer, then the list can be deleted from the article (no need for a large block of duplicate info within an article). --Stephane Charette 17:58, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
I think Wakemp meant "navbox", what you call a "footer", instead of "infobox" since Vancouver School Board does not have an infobox. -- Usgnus 18:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
I was refering to Template:VancouverSchools, Surrey needs one of these. My other question remains whether the list of schools is required for information beyond the name of the school which is what I was trying to show with the table of Schools in School District 5 Southeast Kootenay Wakemp 18:23, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Come to the think of it, a NavBox won't work with the neighbourhoods intact. Something like Vancouver's would be better. -→Buchanan-Hermit/!? 18:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

New Style School list

edit

I've added the footer box (template) for the schools as well as reformatting the main school list. The question remains whether both are required but I think this is a much better presentation than before. Wakemp 01:13, 25 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Looks good. I removed the redundant "Secondary School" and "Elementary School" from the navbox (easy with Emacs) and corrected a few typos. I also removed the two categories (infobox and parserFunctions). We don't need both the navbox and the list. -- Usgnus
Should we title the navboxes with Schools in School District 36 Surrey instead of Schools in Surrey, British Columbia?
I agree it would make more sense to use Schools in School District 36 Surrey Wakemp 02:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC)Reply
The VancovuerSchools template includes both public and private schools so it is a little different from this one.
Let's move discussion of navboxes to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Education in Canada

Please merge any relevant content from Georges_Vanier_Elementary_School per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General Vanier Elementary School. Thanks. Quarl (talk) 2006-12-29 14:59Z

List of Schools – Private Schools

edit

Private schools (aka independent schools) are technically not part of the public school districts. 216.232.127.117 19:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please merge any relevant content from A H P Matthew Elementary School per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A S Matheson Elementary School. (If there is nothing to merge, just leave it as a redirect.) Thanks. Quarl (talk) 2007-03-01 08:30Z

Schools with own articles

edit

Hey folks, Schools do NOT deserve their own WP article simply by virtue of existing. This clearly fails the notability test. If you are going to create an article about a school, it needs to have some substance in it of note. There has to be something special about it, and a good way to test this is to see if it is mentioned in a major news source. If not, it doesn't need to have its own page on wikipedia- instead, it can just be listed in the district page. Epthorn 07:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC

I agree, and I think we should start deleting the secondary schools' individual pages. Most of them have little to no content or are just listing out students that won awards while there. Schmloof (talk) 17:19, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
You will get little support for this approach. Numerous AfDs have shown that secondary schools can be sourced to meet WP:N. Elementary/middle schools are the opposite; in their case few meet the standard. The way forward is to source and expand the secondary school pages not delete them. TerriersFan (talk) 02:48, 19 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Improper Merger

edit

The merge of Discovery Elementary School was improperly performed. I therefore request a correction be made or that the merge be undone. Please add the "notable" postal code to this article. It was available in the main article but is no longer available. The removal of this important information is frustrating not only for Wikipedia but for Google maps users. I came upon this information via google maps search in that area. The current format of this article School District 36 Surrey (the one it was merged too), makes it difficult to add content. Can someone please properly merge the information. Otherwise, this notable information will need to be re-instated via it's own article. Thank you! --CyclePat (talk) 15:15, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I don't understand what exactly you want added. What is notable about the postal code? I don't see any mention of it in the previous article. There is a "Notes" section to add some content and extra rows could be added for more expansion of individual entries. A new section could even be added, if necessary, but if there's that much reliably-sourced content, then a separate article is likely supportable. DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:45, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
In fact, there already is a separate section in this article for Discovery. DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:51, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
The table which was located on the right of the article contains important information such as the coordinates, postal codes. etc. Here it is the table:
Discovery Elementary
Address
13104 109 Ave

, ,
V3T 2N7

Canada
Information
School typePublic Elementary school
School boardSchool District 36 Surrey
School number3636074
PrincipalMs. C Graham
GradesK-7
Enrollment113 (16 January 2006)
LanguageEnglish
Last updated: March 29, 2006

--CyclePat (talk) 22:12, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

But why is that information necessary in a Wikipedia article? Wikipedia isn't a phone book ... --yycguy81 (Talk) 14:02, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Branding

edit

I am in the communication services department for the Surrey School District and one of the department's roles is use of brand and logo. The district developed a new logo in 2011 and I'd like to replace the old logo, which was removed last week, with the new one in the information box at top right. Cattledoglady (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2013 (UTC) The old logo was removed due to a lack of a valid fair use rationale, if a valid FUR is on the file, the image may be restored to the page.  █ EMARSEE 01:55, 27 July 2013 (UTC) Thank you! Cattledoglady (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Non-English languages used by the district

edit

PUNJABI:

WhisperToMe (talk) 06:24, 28 October 2014 (UTC) ... and so? Totoro33 (talk) 06:32, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

@Totoro33: The importance is to determine which languages are high priority for the subject. Articles about school districts in Canada and the US should be created on non-English Wikipedias. Knowing which ones to target is important. I sent a user on the Punjabi Wikipedia to create a version of this article in Punjabi: pa:ਵਰਤੋਂਕਾਰ ਗੱਲ-ਬਾਤ:Babanwalia#Article request for Punjabi: School District 36 Surrey (largest school district in British Columbia, and in largest Punjabi community of BC) – I tend to create the stub article myself if it is Spanish, French, or Chinese, but for other languages I must ask somebody. WhisperToMe (talk) 07:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
pa:ਸਕੂਲੀ ਜ਼ਿਲ੍ਹਾ 36 ਸਰ੍ਹੀ has been started WhisperToMe (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Okay, makes sense! :-) Totoro33 (talk) 02:46, 29 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Found Urdu brochures at https://web.archive.org/web/20101221181618/http://sd36.bc.ca/general/brochures/urdu.html so it may also be good to have an Urdu article WhisperToMe (talk) 08:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on School District 36 Surrey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply