Talk:School for visually impaired in Peja
Latest comment: 9 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
 | School for the Blind, Peć was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 9 May 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into School for visually impaired in Peja. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 March 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Requested move 24 December 2014
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: procedural close; please continue centralized discussion at Talk:Architecture of Peja#Requested move 24 December 2014. Dekimasuよ! 18:20, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
School for visually impaired in Peja → School for visually impaired in Peć – Consistency with main article, Peć. Also, that is COMMONNAME also anyway. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 12:31, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Should have the same name as the parent article. IJA (talk) 13:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose; since when did a RM closed as "no consensus" constitute a mandate to rename dozens of other articles and redirects and categories for "consistency"? bobrayner (talk) 13:54, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support for consistency per WP:AT. --Local hero talk 16:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Support - with same arguments as in the entries of the two previous supporting users, consistency with the main article being the most important one. Also, as stated in the other discussion about this, both Peć and Pejë/Peja are considered official, although Peć appears to be the one that's established itself in English, just like we say Kiev and Gothenburg instead of Kyiv and Göteborg. - Anonimski (talk) 16:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Move discussion in progress
editThere is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Architecture of Peja which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:30, 24 December 2014 (UTC)