Talk:Schrödinger's cat
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about views on Schrödinger's cat, interpretations of quantum mechanics, or physics in general. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about views on Schrödinger's cat, interpretations of quantum mechanics, or physics in general at the Reference desk. |
| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Schrödinger's cat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
‹See TfM›
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Copied to Quantum Mind page
editThe following section was copied to the Quantum Mind page on 4 Feb 2018 by user: wcrea6:
Erwin Schrödinger described how one could, in principle, create entanglement of a large-scale system by making it dependent on an elementary particle in a superposition. He proposed a scenario with a cat in a locked steel chamber, wherein the cat's life or death depended on the state of a radioactive atom, whether it had decayed and emitted radiation or not. According to Schrödinger, the Copenhagen interpretation implies that the cat remains both alive and dead until the state has been observed. Schrödinger did not wish to promote the idea of dead-and-alive cats as a serious possibility; on the contrary, he intended the example to illustrate the absurdity of the existing view of quantum mechanics.[1] However, since Schrödinger's time, other interpretations of the mathematics of quantum mechanics have been advanced by physicists, some of which regard the "alive and dead" cat superposition as quite real.[2][3]
References
- ^ Schrödinger, Erwin (November 1935). "Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik (The present situation in quantum mechanics)". Naturwissenschaften. 23 (48): 807–812. Bibcode:1935NW.....23..807S. doi:10.1007/BF01491891.
- ^ Polkinghorne, J. C. (1985). The Quantum World. Princeton University Press. p. 67. ISBN 0691023883. Archived from the original on 2015-05-19.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|deadurl=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help) - ^ Tetlow, Philip (2012). Understanding Information and Computation: From Einstein to Web Science. Gower Publishing, Ltd. p. 321. ISBN 1409440400. Archived from the original on 2015-05-19.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|deadurl=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help)
Semi-protected edit request on 7 September 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
"A commonly held interpretation of quantum mechanics is the Copenhagen interpretation.[13] In the Copenhagen interpretation, a system stops being a superposition of states and becomes either one or the other when an observation takes place. This thought experiment makes apparent the fact that the nature of measurement, or observation, is not well-defined in this interpretation, (x) which simply provides no explanation for the nature of the cat while the box is closed. The wavefunction description of the system consists of a superposition of the states "decayed nucleus/dead cat" and "undecayed nucleus/living cat". Only when the box is opened and observed can we make a statement about the cat.[5]: 157"
Where i've written (x), add "thus giving way to the interpretation problem which Schrodinger tried to solve" That'll make it more clear what the whole point of schrodinger's cat actually is MAahilM (talk) 14:41, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
- @MAahilM I changed the paragraph though not in the way you requested. The cat concept is not about the measurement problem itself, that is the issue of how a quantum state in superposition becomes an eigenstate of measurement. Please reveiw. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:17, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Already done ⸺(Random)staplers 18:12, 7 September 2024 (UTC)
Borderline synthesis?
editA lot of this article seems to be of the form "Cat is about X, here is Stuff about X", whether or not the source connects "Stuff" to "Cat". Johnjbarton (talk) 18:01, 7 September 2024 (UTC)