This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Polyhedra, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of polygons, polyhedra, and other polytopes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolyhedraWikipedia:WikiProject PolyhedraTemplate:WikiProject PolyhedraPolyhedra articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
In an edit summary on the article, User:EEng asked: "what's all this "CSS image crop" stuff for?". It's because I think the portrait of Schwarz has a lot of unnecessary space devoted to the lower part of his jacket, and is better with a tighter aspect ratio focusing more on his face and upper body:
Original scan
As cropped on commons
Tighter CSS crop
It's not like I'm disrespecting the artistic integrity of the original, or anything, because without the CSS crop it would still be a different crop of the original. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:23, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
That's fine, just wondering because I hadn't seen the syntax before, and asking you was easier than finding out for myself. One comment, though. There's some fragility to specifying, over here, particular crop "coordinates" for an image stored elsewhere, since such images can get cropped or edited silently in ways that invalidate the cropping being done here. This is similar to a (more serious) problem with the {{Annotated image}} feature: after all the fussing to make little rectangles and add annotations and stuff, even a small, innocent adjustment to the base image over at Commons turns it all into unintelligible nonsense. EEng17:40, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
The coordinates are all relative to the dimensions within the cropped result, so as long as the original image framing remains unchanged, the crop will still work. A bigger issue is that it is impossible to use CSS image crops whose size is relative to the default image size of the person reading the article, as |upright= will do on uncropped images. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:15, 20 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Changes to the original image framing are exactly my concern. But we've got bigger fish to fry elsewhere. ;) EEng01:31, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply