Talk:Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner

This article was nominated for deletion on May 27, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Low‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neutrality

The style is not neutral to me:

"In focusing on high technology patent applications, the firm's successes mirrored those of the tech boom of the late 1990s. The firm was able to last through the associated tribulations of the tech boom, however, due in part to their lean operations. It is thought that the firm is one first to eschew the traditional assignment of a secretary to an attorney, in favor of assignment of specialized staff to clients; in interfacing with a client, the firm's attorneys work through a client's dedicated staff. Highly entrepreneurial, the firm has developed docketing software for internal use, and for resale to other law firms and to corporations."

--Edcolins 10:35, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

Please fix it by rewriting and remove the npov template. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 11:27, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Fine. [1]. Not disputed anymore. --Edcolins 10:14, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Disputed

This point are dubious:

"the intellectual property law firm was one of the first patent law boutique firms to focus solely on patent prosecution and not on patent litigation".

Such type of boutiques probably exist since the mid-1800's. --Edcolins 10:35, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)

Research and fix this too. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 11:27, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ditto. Not disputed anymore.. --Edcolins 10:14, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Move Article

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The company in this entry has shortened its name to Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.. Can someone change the article's name? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.106.3.2 (talk) 15:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic