Talk:Science Publishing Group
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Section needed?
editI seem to think a section is not needed because the article is tiny. But someone else thinks not. Why's that? Thanks. Biosthmors (talk) 01:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
European Business & Management
editEuropean Business & Management. ISSN number 2575-5811 redirects to here, is that accurate? More info https://portal.issn.org/resource/ISSN/2575-5811 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.112.177.218 (talk) 15:53, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Hatnote bloat
editThe number of hatnotes on this article is ludicrous. You can barely see the article when you get here. Do you really expect people to search through all of those? Praemonitus (talk) 16:48, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- That is representative of the publishing group's tactics of appearing to sound like or present as other more established journals. While a bit ridiculous, the clarifications are important and rather essential to properly discriminate against those other journals. Himay81 (talk) 17:53, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
"Science Frontiers" fringe publishing
editSee .[1] Frank Joseph - member of the American Nazi Party then started writing fringe nonsense.
References
- ^ Joseph, Frank; "The Candelabra of the Andes", The Ancient American, 2:10, no. 10, 1995, reproduced at Science Frontiers ONLINE, No. 102: Nov-Dec 1995), accessed 3 Nov 2010
Doug Weller talk 15:53, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller: That's a different Science Frontiers that isn't affiliated with SPG, AFAICT. It is cited a few times on Wikipedia though [1] [2]. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 21:34, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I’ll look at those links tomorrow perhaps. Doug Weller talk 21:38, 15 January 2024 (UTC)