Talk:Science in newly industrialized countries

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Article Tone

edit

This article seems to be just of one persons opinion or thoughts on this subject matter. It doesnt seem to be very accurate and seems to be making massive assumptions about countries histories and about science. (17:57, 21 January 2012‎) (by 31.205.28.203)

POV problems

edit

Many of the claims made in the article sound like they should be controversial, and yet only one point of view is presented throughout. Explanations of why certain countries have advanced science and technology are an area of active controversy in sociology and the history of science. -- Beland (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Anyone is welcome to improve the article on those countsHallenrm (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Major rewriting or deletion

edit

I want to pose an appeal for major rewriting or deletion of this article, because of a deeply ingrained one-sided narration of interpretations of critically discussed issues of socio-historical science, in this article!? Nsae Comp (talk) 23:33, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Science in newly industrialized countries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply