Talk:Science in newly industrialized countries

Science in newly industrialized countries received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Science

	Science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Culture

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CultureWikipedia:WikiProject CultureTemplate:WikiProject Cultureculture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

History of Science High‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article Tone

This article seems to be just of one persons opinion or thoughts on this subject matter. It doesnt seem to be very accurate and seems to be making massive assumptions about countries histories and about science. (17:57, 21 January 2012‎) (by 31.205.28.203)

POV problems

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Many of the claims made in the article sound like they should be controversial, and yet only one point of view is presented throughout. Explanations of why certain countries have advanced science and technology are an area of active controversy in sociology and the history of science. -- Beland (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Anyone is welcome to improve the article on those countsHallenrm (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Major rewriting or deletion

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I want to pose an appeal for major rewriting or deletion of this article, because of a deeply ingrained one-sided narration of interpretations of critically discussed issues of socio-historical science, in this article!? Nsae Comp (talk) 23:33, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Science in newly industrialized countries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071215061136/http://www.mre.gov.br/cdbrasil/itamaraty/web/ingles/economia/ctec/panhist/apresent.htm to http://www.mre.gov.br/cdbrasil/itamaraty/web/ingles/economia/ctec/panhist/apresent.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic