Talk:Scientology in Canada
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Legal status as a religion" section
editI have tagged it as refimprove. There are two newspapers saying different things. Info should be sourced from somewhere more reliable and authoritative i.e. govt depts. The academic book quoted is a good source as well and its findings are the ones I put at Scientology as a state-recognized religion. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 23:55, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
Added Link This could also stand to be linked in... don't have time or wikipedia skills to actually make a decent edit, but it shouldn't be hard (and it's quite relevant IMO) [1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.35.4.130 (talk) 01:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- I've added the link you suggested and also summarized the article on Hill v. Church of Scientology of Toronto. Ross Fraser (talk) 05:31, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Scientology isn't a registered charity in Canada (see http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/ebci/haip/srch/basicsearchresult-eng.action?s=+&k=&p=1&b=true). It isn't recognized by the Canadian Military: http://www.cmp-cpm.forces.gc.ca/pub/rc/doc/rc-eng.pdf I don't know where to obtain info on churches that can issue marriage banns in Canada. Ross Fraser (talk) 06:02, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Scientology and Conservatives: is the government burying its head in the sand?
editScientology and Conservatives: is the government burying its head in the sand?, Céline Hervieux-Payette.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Scientology in Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.thevarsity.ca/article/1293
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5yLc3T9Xn?url=http://www.sptimes.com/News/32999/Worldandnation/Abroad__Critics_publi.html to http://www.sptimes.com/News/32999/Worldandnation/Abroad__Critics_publi.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 20 May 2017 (UTC)