Talk:Scofield Reservoir
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result was merge Scofield Dam into Scofield Reservoir. -- DeFaultRyan (talk) 17:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
It seems that we could merge Scofield Dam into this article (including a redirect) and create a single, well-crafted, complete article from these two. We could even redirect Scofield State Park to here and put information relevant to the state park status into this article. I've also noticed that the majority of the information on Scofield Dam is already on Scofield Reservoir. Having two serparate articles looks a little redundant right now.
Any objections? DeFaultRyan (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
- Great idea. This is just what should happen. Be my guest. Ntsimp (talk) 23:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
Rating (WP Lakes assessment)
editI have made this a C-class, alongside the WP Utah rating, as though the article has a sufficient amount of content to reach B, it needs much more inline citations that are properly done with the {{citation}} template. -- ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ τ ¢ 21:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Scofield Reservoir/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
After seeing that no article existed for Scofield Reservoir. I've created this page. I'm trying to follow the Wikiproject Lakes template as best as I can, but any help would be appreciated Jaromhuff21 (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 15:53, 22 July 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 05:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)