Talk:Scopa

Latest comment: 1 year ago by ProofCreature in topic Move discussion in progress
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Fishing

edit

I just changed game type to 'fishing', from trick-taking. I know that seems like a joke, but that's actually what Scopa is, like curenta, rather than boure or the like.

Bah, I wasn't paying attention and reverted it. I'll undo my changes... Mindmatrix 16:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

For all I know, and the Italian wiki says, the scopone scientifico is played with 9 cards in hand and 4 on the table - scientific is referred to the fact that luck has a lesser role in the first hand. Gioland71 02:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

What I have read is that the four player game with all cards dealt out at the beginning, is the "scientific" game, whether each player nine cards and four cards on the floor, or each player ten cards and no cads on the floor, are just subvariants. --Zzo38 (talk) 22:04, 12 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

"American" cards

edit

are French. Rp (talk) 09:54, 22 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've changed it. AlbionBT (talk) 09:59, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Italian cards

edit

It says the "Italian" cards is used, but I think actually the cards used are called "Italo-Spanish" cards, which is one of the kind of Italian cards; another kind of Italian cards is the "North Italian" cards, which has more cards than the "Italo-Spanish" deck; to use them for this game you will have to omit some cards so that you are left with only forty cards.

Scopa at the last round

edit

This article claims "Clearing the table on the last play of the last hand of a round does not count as a scopa." but I can't find any rule where this is specified. Can we source this ?

--Alien Mauricette (talk) 12:47, 6 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Scopa (disambiguation) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 11:46, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

eh?

ProofCreature (talk) 12:28, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply