Talk:Score (Carol Lloyd album)/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 04:40, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

• I will grab this for a review if that is okay with you. Aoba47 (talk) 04:40, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Lead and infobox

• For this part (the label which specialized solely in disco music.), I believe that a comma is needed after “label” and before “which”.

Done

• For this part (as singles to support and promote the album), I am not sure that “support” and “promote” are both needed as they both seem to be conveying the same meaning, at least to me, so I would choose one or the other.

Done

• For this part (the album was similarly well received), I would clarify that you mean well received by critics.

Done

Background

• Please link Carol Lloyd on the first instance in which you mention her in the body of the article.

Done

• For this part (The label would consist solely of artists), I would clarify “the label” as Earmac Records as you mentioned two record labels in the previous sentence.

Done

• For this part (It was distributed to the), I think it should read as “through the” as opposed to “to the”.

Done

• For this part (It now included the 7" and 12" versions), I do not believe that the “now” part is needed.

Done

Promotion

• I would retitle the section to “Singles” as it focuses entirely on the single releases.

Done

• Please move the B-side link up to the first instance in which the term is used (i.e. in the “Background” section).

Done

• For this part (and list it as a recommended track for readers of the magazine), I think you mean “listed” as opposed to “list”.

Done

Reception

• I have no issues with this part.

Track listing

• Please add a note about the producers.

Done

• For the “2016 digital bonus tracks” collapsable bit, I would include the writers as well to avoid having it look blank/empty.

Done

Personel

• No issues here

Release history

• I believe a section like this would be necessary.

Done

References

• Make sure that the work/publisher parameters for each citation is linked. For instance, Billboard should be linked in all of the citations.

Done

External links

• No issues here

Final comments

• Wonderful work on this! Once my comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to promote this as a GA. Aoba47 (talk) 05:04, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

• Aoba47 – I completed revising the article per your suggestions. Thank you very much, Carbrera (talk) 06:45, 3 February 2018 (UTC).

Verdict

• Thank you for addressing everything. I will ✓ Pass this. Aoba47 (talk) 15:08, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.