This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Scott Brown (politician) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Scott Brown (politician) has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Scott Brown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100116220340/http://www.boston.com:80/news/local/breaking_news/2010/01/brown_criticize.html to http://www.boston.com/news/local/breaking_news/2010/01/brown_criticize.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:37, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Requested move 26 September 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:48, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
– The politician has not held public office since losing his US senate seat in 2012. Page views at "Scott Brown", not all of which will relate to the politician, now average below 1,000 per day. Scott Brown (footballer, born June 1985) (the best known footballer by this name) has around 500 views per day. I don't think it is justifiable to give the politician priority over all other Scott Browns put together. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 13:52, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support no absolute majority topic. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support - politician is not the primary topic. If anything that should be the Celtic player. Unreal7 (talk) 17:42, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support, as nominator. Per google searches, "Scott Brown + Massachusetts" gives 5,950,000 results, while "Scott Brown + Celtic" gives 4,590,000. Alternative searches for each, such as "Scott Brown + New Hampshire" or "Scott Brown + Scotland" give similar results (circa 5 million results). I don't think there is a clear primary topic. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 20:35, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
- For the record, you don't have to support your own nomination - it's inherently implied by the fact you started it. Nohomersryan (talk) 17:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support per arguments above. Champaign Supernova (talk) 16:15, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support. I recall stumbling upon this a bit ago and being surprised that the politician was the primary topic. Nohomersryan (talk) 17:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Scott Brown (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.mass.gov/?pageID=veteransterminal&L=2&L0=Home&L1=Returning%20Veterans&sid=Eveterans&b=terminalcontent&f=bonuses_gwot&csid=Eveterans
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100325232141/http://abbey.msmabbey.org/ to http://abbey.msmabbey.org/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://scottbrown.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Scott Brown (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100120103947/http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/politics/local_politics/poll-scott-brown-surges-to-double-digit-lead-over-martha-coakley to http://www.myfoxboston.com/dpp/news/politics/local_politics/poll-scott-brown-surges-to-double-digit-lead-over-martha-coakley
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110707071222/http://media.969bostontalks.com/Podcasts/1466/010510senatedebatepart1.mp3 to http://media.969bostontalks.com/Podcasts/1466/010510senatedebatepart1.mp3
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
Inclusion of Northeastern U
editI see nothing that would prevent us from listing his ROTC experience at Northeastern University. It is part of his education. This field is not exclusively about degrees, it is about the subject's educational history. Elizium23 (talk) 04:08, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
- I certainly believe that ROTC classes are fine for a brief mention in the body. However, some things just don't need to be in the infobox. While he took ROTC classes (how many?) at Northwestern, that doesn't mean he was ever formally enrolled. It wasn't a degree program, and "ROTC" is not a degree. While the eduction section is meant to [describe]
the subject's educational history
, that doesn't mean every little detail needs to be included in the infobox. High schools and high school diplomas, for example, aren't listed. Associate degrees, trade schools, and certificate programs are often left out. In this case, ROTC classes do not belong in the infobox. The "education" field is general, yes, but it is primarily used for colleges/universities and degrees earned. To include ROTC next to BA and JD as if it was another degree is not correct. One thing is not like the other. KidAd talk 04:15, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
How old?
editI see reference to being age 12 and appearing before Judge Zoll, but the provided reference says:
"It’s unclear exactly how old Brown was when he was arrested. In the book, Brown says it was the summer of 1973, making him 13, but Zoll didn’t take over the Salem court until 1974, when Brown would have been 14."
Carlm0404 (talk) 07:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
- When originally added to the article, this information was given as "13 or 14" for the age. This lasted until June 2013 when an IP editor changed it to "12" without comment. I've restored the original, per the source. —ADavidB 10:21, 13 May 2021 (UTC)