Talk:Scottish National Liberation Army
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Scotland may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editThe bulk of this article has no sources nor any way of verification. GeorgeLouis 06:13, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
I agree. But, there has been a book circulating the Internet by an alleged News of the World Reporter, David Leslie called "Inside the SNLA" but having not read it all (it's very badly formatted online) I'm loathe to put it in as a source. In addition, which "official" sources claim that there are 100-125 members? Most anti-terrorist experts believe the organisation has barely a pub table full of members. As to the "500" claim, it's speculative and irrelevant. --Jarvisbaird 10:43, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
- http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2090-2351365,00.html - To add to article —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Weggie (talk • contribs) 12:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Cleaned up the first sentance a bit. The rest of the page still reads like a PR piece though, and maybe this article and other articles pertaining to small terror groups should be folded into another article. -SteveG —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.12.100.241 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
I liked this bit "which nearly blew up in one of her assistant's faces". How many faces did her assistants have? 84.135.215.37 18:53, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Make SSG a separate article
editThe information on SSG should be expanded on and made into a separate article seeing as it is a separate organisation from SNLA - 92.23.145.129 (talk) 21:14, 14 April 2010 (UTC)