Talk:Scouting and Guiding in Anguilla
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Scouting and Guiding in Anguilla be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in Anguilla may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editTel/Fax (+1 264) 497 85 67 dfmr@anguillanet.com
Merge of separate Scout and Guide articles to here
editIt is proposed that the two separate articles on Scouting and Guiding be merged into this article. The size of both organizations is small and it is difficult to demonstrate notability. It is unlikely that the single article will grow in the near future to be large enough that demands a fork. See the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scouting/Girl Guiding and Girl Scouting task force#United Kingdom outlying Guiding.
- Support merge for reasons given above. --Bduke (Discussion) 11:27, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support ---— Gadget850 (Ed) talk 13:03, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support merge for reasons given above. --Phips (talk) 23:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Non-free use of File:Scout Association of the West Indies.png
editThe non-free use of the image in this article is currently being discussed at WP:NFCR#File:Scout Association of the West Indies.png. All interested editors are welcome to participate and comment on whether use of the image complies with WP:NFCCP. Thanks in advance. - Marchjuly (talk) 04:05, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
- The consensus at the above referenced NFCR discussion is that the use of the image in this article does not satisfy WP:NFCC#8. The image is not being used as the primary means of identification of the subject of this article in the infobox as is being claimed in its non-free use rationale. The image is also not the subject of any sourced critical commentary with in the article itself, and the caption provided for the image may be true, but no source is cited in support so it cannot be verified so it is essentially original research. Moreover, how the image significantly improves the reader's understanding of this particular article is not clear at all. The image seems to be being used purely for decorative purposes which something that is not allowed per NFCC#8. - Marchjuly (talk) 01:19, 23 June 2015 (UTC)