This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Northern Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Northern Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Northern IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject Northern IrelandTemplate:WikiProject Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland-related articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
This page should not be speedily deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because I see absolutely no reason for it. Please clarify what the reason for deletion should be. – Aklein62 (talk) 22:00, 12 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
I removed the 'speedy deletion box', because I see absolutely no reason why the article should be deleted. Nobody responded to my demand to explain it. The removal of the photograph is, in my opinion, also exaggerated, although probably the original editor did not take care to ensure s/he had the right to use it. – Aklein62 (talk) 09:13, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
I have removed the copyright violations from the article as an alternative to deletion. Please be aware that you will not always receive an immediate reply to your posts, as people might be asleep on the other side of the world (Canada) and unable to respond promptly to your posts. — Diannaa (talk) 12:49, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply
