Talk:Señor Macho Solo/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 19:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I have copy edited a little to fix some prose issues. I feel that the article is well referenced, balanced, adequately coves the subject matter and meets the criteria of a good article. Xtzou (Talk) 19:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: Pass!

Congratulations! Xtzou (Talk) 19:26, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 19:32, 14 April 2010 (UTC)