Talk:SeaChange

Focus

Rather too much talk about how incredibly/phenomenally successful this show is. I don't know nothing about SeaChange, which shows it at least wasn't so amazingly successful everywhere. Someone who knows more about this show needs to edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Martijn faassen (talk • contribs) 00:14, 23 September 2004 (UTC)

-It was certainly talked about a lot when new episodes were showing. Revenge 13:35, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

During its run it was much talked about and the highest rating program on the network that screened it - the ABC. Asa01 07:10, 25 October 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, don't know the procedure for TV series, are we looking for what happened in the show, or what happened about the show? I'd be up for editing a bit to bring it up to scratch if its about what happened in the show, but I daresay thats not an encyclopedia??? --DanielBC 10:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:SeaChange-Australian-TV-series).jpg

Image:SeaChange-Australian-TV-series).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SeaChange. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091024063256/http://www.unsw.edu.au/news/pad/articles/2001/aug/seachange.html to http://www.unsw.edu.au/news/pad/articles/2001/aug/seachange.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:47, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed merge with Pearl Bay

Subject is not sufficiently notable on its own merits Rogermx (talk) 22:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)