Edit request

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Your request does not specify which source applies to which portion of the text. If a COI edit request contains a verbatim copy of the requested text, this must include properly formatted references placed at the precise location where a claim is made (See WP:INTEGRITY). "Please add the following sources" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "Please change A to B using C as the reference".

Please change last sentence of history section to - "In December 2014 SeaChange acquired Timeline Labs, a start-up that makes tools for broadcasters and video service providers for audience measurement via social media.[15]"

Please add to end of history section. - "SeaChange appointed Ed Terino as their new CEO in 2016." Source: https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2016/04/07/826998/0/en/SeaChange-International-Appoints-Software-Veteran-Ed-Terino-to-Chief-Executive-Officer.html

Please update first paragraph of Products section to - "Previously, SeaChange offered..."

Please add new paragraph to Products section - "In 2018 Seachange launched The PanoramiC Platform and The cFlow Portfolio. The PanoramiC Platform offers video providers an integrated, open PaaS solution built on complementary streaming technologies from leading vendors. source https://www.thebroadcastbridge.com/content/entry/11256/seachange-international-re-invents-product-portfolio-with-cflow. The SeaChange cFlow Portfolio equips video providers with a comprehensive set of tools for video management and personalization. The cFlow Portfolio comprises four key solution families that can be used together or individually to centralize and simplify the task of offering branded, indivisual viewer experiences across multiple network and screen types, cContent for Content Management, cBridge for Offer, Session & Transaction Management, cAds for Advertising Management, and cView for Viewer Experience. https://globenewswire.com/news-release/2018/05/31/1514776/0/en/SeaChange-Launches-Powerful-Cloud-Based-End-to-End-Multi-Screen-Video-Management-and-Delivery-Platform.html Marsoc6 (talk) 17:35, 1 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reply 01-AUG-2018

Unable to review edit request

Your edit request could not be reviewed because in at least one instance it is unclear which reference is connected to which claim statement in the text of your proposal. When proposing edit requests, it is important to highlight in the text which specific sources are doing the referencing for each claim. The point of an inline citation is to allow the reviewer and readers to check that the material is sourced; that point is lost if the citation's note number is not clearly placed. Note the example below:

N INCORRECT
The sun is pretty big. Sjöblad, Tristan. The Sun. Academic Press, 2018, p. 1.
The moon is not so big. Duvalier, Gabrielle. "Size of the Moon", Scientific American, 51(78):46.
The sun is also quite hot.[15]

In the example above there are two references provided along with a number 15 placed in brackets behind a third proposal. This is an approximation of how your edit request is structured. As you can see, while 2 of the requests are understandable, the third is not. The link between material and its source reference must be more clearly made, as shown in the next example below:

Y CORRECT
The sun is pretty big,^[1] but the moon is not so big.^[2] The sun is also quite hot.^[3]

References

^ Sjöblad, Tristan. The Sun. Academic Press, 2018, p. 1.

^ Duvalier, Gabrielle. "Size of the Moon", Scientific American, 51(78):46.

^ Uemura, Shū. The Sun's Heat. Academic Press, 2018, p. 2.

In the example above, the links between the provided references and their claim statements are perfectly clear, and we can see that number 15 was to a third reference which was not provided earlier. Kindly reformulate your edit request so that it aligns more with the second example above, and feel free to re-submit that edit request at your earliest convenience. Regards, spintendo 00:08, 2 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Edit request

Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. Please see the Reply section below for additional information about this request.

Please change last sentence of history section to - "In December 2014 SeaChange acquired Timeline Labs, a start-up that makes tools for broadcasters and video service providers for audience measurement via social media.[15]"

Please add to end of history section. - "SeaChange appointed Ed Terino as their new CEO in 2016."[20]

Please update first paragraph of Products section to - "Previously, SeaChange offered..."

Please add new paragraph to Products section - "In 2018 Seachange launched The PanoramiC Platform and The cFlow Portfolio. The PanoramiC Platform is a pre-integrated end-to-end cloud-based video delivery platform, that can be used by content producers, broadcasters, cable and mobile operators and aggregators (such as vMVPDs) for multiplatform delivery.[21] The cFlow portfolio is a set of comprehensive video management solutions including, cContent - Content Management, cBridge - Offer, Session, and Transaction Management, cAds - Advertising Management, and cView - View Experience.[22]

References [15] David Bloom (December 22, 2014). "SeaChange buys TV Social-Media Toolmaker Timeline Labs". Deadline Hollywood. Retrieved January 15, 2015.

[20] Source: https://www.multichannel.com/news/terino-samit-out-seachange-ceo-403946

[21] Source: https://www.tvtechnology.com/news/consistent-experience-is-key-to-combining-ott-linear-tv

[22] Source: http://premiere.digitalmedianet.com/article/Seachange-cFlow-Portfolio-Equips-Content-Owners-Aggregators-Service-Providers-To-Serve-Up-Personalization-5545498

Marsoc6 (talk) 16:38, 4 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Reply 04-SEP-2018

Partially implemented

Y Ed Torino was added to the History section.
Y The claim regarding the acquisition of Timeline was appended to the History section.
N The first paragraph of the Products section could not be updated. (See #5 below.)
N The new paragraph of the Products section could not be added because the text is not formatted correctly. The use of capitalization must conform to Wikipedia's Manual of Style even in cases where the company prefers that it be specialized.
Additional changes made: Information in the Products section which was unreferenced was omitted. This includes the first sentence of the section (which was referenced) because it had been requested that this sentence be changed to read as "Previously, SeaChange offered...". This implies that the product is no longer being offered, and it was felt that having the only remaining product listed be one that was previously offered would be confusing for the reader. Please advise if this product is still being offered, in which case it would be appropriate to include it in this section.