Talk:Seabrook Floodgate
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph of Seabrook Floodgate be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in New Orleans may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Untitled
editI added another objective news source and took out a few lines that had a non-neutral tone. Could you please approve and post this so it can be accessed?
Can someone please explain how I link to this article from other pages? I don't know how to do that, and I would really like these warnings removed. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashleydennison (talk • contribs) 19:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
- Generally, the safest way is to wait for someone else to add the links. That way, you have a check on your opinions.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 19:39, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
What can I do to get other wikipedians to link to my article so we can also remove that tag? My goal is to get all the tags off the beginning of this article - they're kinda ugly and distracting.
I'd also like the COI tag removed if possible - I thought we established earlier that the language has been changed enough that it no longer reads as a press release or a promotion of any company. It's just straight up information. Ashleydennison (talk) 15:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
It looks like the COI discussion has been removed for all my entries, including this article on the Seabrook floodgate so I am going to go ahead and remove the COI tag. If someone else disagrees or has an alternate viewpoint, please let me know. Ashleydennison (talk) 17:27, 27 September 2010 (UTC)