Talk:Seamen's and Soldiers' False Characters Act 1906

Latest comment: 1 year ago by TSventon in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk03:34, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that despite being in force for more than 100 years no known prosecutions were made under the Seamen's and Soldiers' False Characters Act 1906? Source: "As with section 1, the Home Office have confirmed that there is no record of any prosecutions being brought under section 2" from: The Law Commission and The Scottish Law Commission (January 2008). "Statute Law Repeals: Eighteenth Report" (PDF). p. 40. Retrieved 24 December 2022.

Created by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 11:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.
Overall:   Article is new and long enough, and no copyvio concerns. Hook fact is present and cited, and while both are interesting I much prefer ALT0. QPQ is done and I don't have any concerns, good to go. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 05:14, 27 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Dumelow, PCN02WPS, and Bruxton:, I have moved this nomination from Prep 6 to Prep 7 to allow Template:Did you know nominations/9 January 1917 German Crown Council meeting to appear on 9 January. TSventon (talk) 13:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply