Talk:Sean Cody
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Another Believer in topic Controversy section
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sean Cody article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
This article is written like an advertisement. 74.89.73.130 (talk) 01:31, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
I agree with the person above. It's an ad, not facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snooskhommer (talk • contribs) 08:04, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Not sure I fully agree. Can you please link to an example page that would not be an ad? Situphobos (talk) 23:41, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
History
editI would appreciate someone with experience to add a detailed history section here — Preceding unsigned comment added by Situphobos (talk • contribs) 07:13, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
Controversy section
editWhy are we adding details about specific models to this Wikipedia article? Who cares...? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:05, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- @K.e.coffman: I see you've trimmed detail about specific people (as opposed to the company/site as a whole) before. Do you agree, this content should be removed? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I believe that this should stay removed. --K.e.coffman (talk) 03:30, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
- @K.e.coffman: I see you've trimmed detail about specific people (as opposed to the company/site as a whole) before. Do you agree, this content should be removed? ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
