Talk:Search analytics

Complaint

The service comparison chart should probably include more descriptive answers than yes/no's.

Notability, non-article entries/deletions

continued from User talk:Hu12

Hi Barek,

Thanks for your response. Being that these are merely entries in a table, are you sure they need to meet the notability guidelines individually? The first sentence of WP:CORP says This page is to help determine whether an organization (commercial or otherwise), or any of its products and services, is a valid subject for a Wikipedia article. However these entries are not the subject of an article. They are merely entries in a table. I have moved this discussion to the search analytics discussion page. Talk:Search analytics

Thanks,

Craig —Preceding unsigned comment added by CrizCraig (talk • contribs) 00:40, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

The Purposes of having entries in a table, is primarily for notable information and Navigation. In order to have navigation, on needs an article to navigate to. Non notable software services should not be included. Inclusion criteria for having navicable articles is notability, as defined under WP:CORP. Tables and lists contain internally linked terms and thus serve as natural tables of contents and indexes in Wikipedia. In other words Write the article first before adding non-notable or non-article entries. Wikipedia is optimized for readers over editors, any lists which exist primarily for development or maintenance purposes should not in the main space. Write the article first. I think the whole services section is unencyclopedic am considering deleting it per WP:NOT.--Hu12 (talk) 05:11, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Okay, would it be better to delete the service comparison table, perhaps describe the general features more, and list the different the services at the bottom like the Keyword research page? 68.2.214.56 (talk) 21:35, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Each entry currently has an article. When this grows, it can become its own indepentent page. the key word research page is a mess, this page is off to a good start, why ruin it. Build the table up by creating appropriate and notable articles. They don't have to be big articles, start with a paragraph or two of neutrally worded context. Just be sure that you have 2-3 good third party Reliable sources per article. --Hu12 (talk) 20:07, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Search analytics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for //adgooroo.com/Products.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Search analytics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://compete.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:58, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Can I include my paper?

Hi, I wrote a paper a number of years ago and I think that it has now become very relevant to Search Analytics. There now literally tens of thousands of search engines and there is no central service for keeping track of them all. The name of the paper is "Mining World Knowledge for Analysis of Search Engine Analysis". [1]https://eprints.qut.edu.au/13119/. The authors are King, J, Li, Tao, D, Nayak, R I also wrote my PhD thesis on the same topic "Search Engine Content Analysis", The author is King, J. [2]https://eprints.qut.edu.au/26241/ JohnDKing (talk) 14:40, 20 February 2023 (UTC)