Talk:Sears–Haack body

• OK there we have who was Wolfgang Haack, but who was Sears ? Hektor (talk) 14:15, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Optimal at slower speeds?

Is there any reason a Sears-Haack body would not be optimal at much lower speeds, say 65mph? —Darxus (talk) 02:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Drag is comprised of 4 components:

1) Profile/ pressure drag

2) Skin-friction drag

3) Lift induced drag

4) Wave drag

The first 3 types of drag are observed at any speeds, while wave drag is a result of shock-waves forming over a body, and thus can only occur when parts of the flow moving over the body exceed the speed of sound (usually around Mach 0.8+). Below Mach ~ 0.8, no shockwaves form and the wave drag is 0

The Sears-Haack body is only optimised to reduce wave drag, however, at 65 mph shocks do not form so this optimisation is not needed. Moreover, the techniques used to optimise a body to reduce wave drag often conflict with techniques used to reduce the other 3 types of drag at subsonic speeds. For example, at subsonic speeds a blunt (rounded) nose cone is needed because sharp edges cause abrupt changes in flow direction (in subsonic flow), whereas the Sears-Haack body has a sharp nose cone to reduce area changes. DanSykes (talk) 15:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I would also like to know this. Sears-Haack is designed for supersonic airflow, air behaves very differently at these speeds. Some information about Sears-Haack at lower speeds may be beneficial to the article? JackStonePGD (talk) 11:58, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sears–Haack body. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927020313/http://www.lima-wiederladetechnik.de/Ballistik/Lilienthal-139-1-Haack.pdf to http://www.lima-wiederladetechnik.de/Ballistik/Lilienthal-139-1-Haack.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:51, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

independent development?

Without any reference it's written, that Sears came up with the idea independently. Really and how so? 6 years later, after Haack had published it (as in publicly available), surely does not point to an independent development. Even if, why name the body after Sears at all? He was still second, no matter if independent or not. And even if you think he deserves credit for this at all, why on earth is his name in front of Haak? It should just be the Haack body, or at least the Haack-Sears body. 77.180.64.236 (talk) 06:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)